SRES-741-119
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2419)
What it does
This resolution designates May 2026 as "National Wildfire Preparedness Month." It encourages awareness and preparedness at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels, and supports educational initiatives on wildfire prevention, home hardening, land management, early warning systems, smoke health impacts, and evacuation planning. It does not create new programs, appropriate funds, or impose any legal requirements.
Who benefits
Residents in wildfire-prone areas across the contiguous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. territories who may gain awareness of prevention and evacuation practices. Firefighters and first responders whose workload could be reduced if public preparedness improves. Homeowners in high-risk zones who learn about fire-resistant construction. Communities near wildland-urban interfaces. Nongovernmental organizations and local agencies that conduct wildfire education, who gain a nationally recognized platform. Pet and livestock owners who benefit from evacuation planning guidance.
Who is hurt
No group faces a direct legal or financial burden from this resolution. Indirectly, critics of symbolic congressional action may argue it consumes legislative time without producing measurable outcomes. There are no identifiable groups materially harmed by the designation itself.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that wildfire risk has grown dramatically — 634,052 wildfires burned over 70 million acres from 2016 to 2025, and 2026 data already shows burn acreage running 94% above the 10-year average. They contend that a nationally designated awareness month costs nothing while amplifying existing educational efforts, encouraging community-level preparedness, and potentially reducing the human-caused ignitions that account for nearly 85% of U.S. wildfires.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that symbolic resolutions do not address the structural drivers of worsening wildfire seasons, such as forest management funding gaps, land use policy, or climate change, and that federal wildfire suppression already costs more than $3 billion per year. They contend that congressional action without accompanying appropriations or policy changes offers little measurable benefit and may create a false impression of meaningful legislative response to a serious and growing national hazard.