SCONRES-29-119
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sponsored by Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
What it does
This concurrent resolution would authorize the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center for an event celebrating the birthday of King Kamehameha I, the founder and first ruler of the unified Kingdom of Hawaii. As a concurrent resolution, it would not carry the force of law and would not require the President's signature.
Who benefits
Native Hawaiian communities and cultural organizations seeking recognition of Hawaiian history in a prominent federal venue. Hawaii's congressional delegation, which typically sponsors such events. Tourism and cultural groups with an interest in promoting Hawaiian heritage. Attendees of the event, including Hawaiian diaspora communities on the mainland.
Who is hurt
No group is materially harmed. Other organizations seeking to use Emancipation Hall on the same date may be displaced or have to reschedule. Taxpayers bear a minimal administrative cost for processing the resolution and coordinating the event.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that King Kamehameha I is a figure of profound historical significance — he unified the Hawaiian Islands in 1810 and his legacy is commemorated by a state holiday in Hawaii. They contend that holding a celebration in Emancipation Hall honors the unique cultural heritage of Native Hawaiians and reflects Congress's longstanding recognition of Hawaii's distinct history, consistent with the Apology Resolution of 1993.
Opponents argue
Opponents could argue that Congress's time and procedural resources are finite, and that passing resolutions to authorize individual venue uses for cultural celebrations — however worthy — sets a precedent for an expanding list of similar requests that consume legislative bandwidth. They might contend that venue scheduling for the Capitol Visitor Center could be handled administratively without requiring a formal concurrent resolution from both chambers.