S-4554-119
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
What it does
This bill would create a legal presumption that certain diseases are work-related for civilian federal employees who served at least 30 days in a country where the U.S. was conducting a military contingency operation on or after August 2, 1990. The list of covered diseases would mirror the list already established for veterans under the PACT Act (38 U.S.C. § 1120(b)). When the Department of Veterans Affairs adds a new disease to the veterans' list, the Department of Labor would be required to add the same disease to the civilian employees' list within 90 days via direct final rule.
Who benefits
Civilian federal employees from agencies including the Departments of Justice, State, Defense, Homeland Security, Treasury, Commerce, and Agriculture, as well as intelligence community personnel and federal law enforcement officers, who were deployed to contingency operation zones and developed covered illnesses. Families of deceased eligible employees who could file death benefit claims. Workers' compensation attorneys and advocates who assist federal employees with claims. Indirectly, federal agencies that may see reduced litigation over disputed workers' comp claims once a presumption is established.
Who is hurt
The federal government (and by extension taxpayers) would bear increased workers' compensation costs as claims that previously required individual proof of causation would now be presumptively approved. The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs at the Department of Labor would face increased administrative workload. Agencies whose budgets are charged for workers' comp costs — particularly DoD, State, and DHS — could see higher expenditures. Private insurers or third-party administrators involved in federal workers' comp programs may face increased claim volumes.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that civilian federal employees — diplomats, intelligence officers, law enforcement agents, and contractors — served alongside military personnel in the same toxic environments, breathing the same burn pit smoke, yet have been denied the presumptive coverage extended to veterans by the 2022 PACT Act. They contend that requiring individual employees to prove a direct causal link between their illness and burn pit exposure is scientifically unreliable given long latency periods for cancers and respiratory diseases, and that the VA's existing disease list already reflects rigorous scientific review, making it a sound basis for civilian coverage without duplicating that process.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that civilian federal employees, unlike military service members, have existing workers' compensation protections under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act and are not subject to the same deployment conditions or restrictions on legal recourse as uniformed personnel, making a blanket presumption difficult to calibrate fairly. They contend that automatically mirroring the VA's disease list — which was developed for a different population with different exposure profiles — may extend presumptive coverage to employees whose illnesses are not causally connected to burn pit exposure, increasing federal compensation costs without sufficient evidentiary basis for each covered condition.