S-3395-119
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Sponsored by Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
What it does
This bill would convert the Department of Veterans Affairs' existing telescreening mammography pilot program into a permanent, nationwide program. It would require the VA to ensure that within two years, every state and Puerto Rico has at least one of the following: a telescreening mammography program, a full-service mammography program at a VA facility, or a mobile mammography program. The bill also requires that all such programs be accessible to veterans with paralysis, spinal cord injuries, or other disabilities.
Who benefits
Female veterans who currently lack access to mammography services through the VA, particularly those in rural or underserved states. Veterans with disabilities — including paralysis and spinal cord injuries — who face physical barriers to accessing breast imaging. Veterans in states where the VA does not currently offer breast imaging services. Mobile and telehealth healthcare providers who may be contracted to expand VA capacity. Breast cancer patients who benefit from earlier detection through wider screening access.
Who is hurt
Private-sector mammography providers and imaging centers near VA facilities may see reduced patient volume if veterans shift to VA-provided services. VA administrative and clinical staff who would bear the implementation burden of standing up new programs in two years. Taxpayers who would fund the program expansion, though the bill does not specify an appropriation amount. Other VA healthcare priorities that may compete for limited departmental resources and staffing during the expansion period.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the existing pilot program demonstrated the viability of telescreening mammography for veterans but left large geographic gaps in coverage, particularly in rural states. They contend that breast cancer is the most common cancer among female veterans, and that early detection through mammography significantly reduces mortality — making nationwide access a matter of basic equity for those who served. The bill's bipartisan sponsorship reflects broad agreement that veterans should not face worse cancer screening access than the general public simply due to where they live.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that converting a pilot program to a permanent nationwide mandate before a formal evaluation is complete bypasses the evidence-gathering process that pilots are designed to provide, potentially locking in an approach before its effectiveness and cost-efficiency are fully understood. They contend that the two-year implementation deadline may be unrealistic given VA staffing shortages and facility constraints, and that unfunded mandates on the VA could strain existing services for all veterans rather than improving outcomes for any specific group.