S-216-119
Became Public Law No: 119-65.
Sponsored by Dan Sullivan (R-AK)
What it does
This law amends the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act and the Marine Debris Act to update how NOAA's Marine Debris Program and the Marine Debris Foundation are administered. It restructures the legal framework by reorganizing and renumbering existing statutes, expands the types of agreements NOAA can use to fund projects (adding "other agreements" alongside grants and contracts), and strengthens governance of the Marine Debris Foundation by clarifying board appointment procedures, adding Secretary of Commerce approval requirements, and creating a formal chief executive officer role. It also extends the program's authorization through fiscal year 2029, adds $2 million in funding for fiscal year 2025, and expands eligibility for grants and partnerships to include Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, and foreign governments.
Who benefits
Coastal communities that experience marine debris accumulation, including fishing ports and beach towns. Indian Tribes and Tribal governments along coastlines and the Great Lakes who gain explicit eligibility for grants and partnerships. Nonprofit organizations working on ocean cleanup who gain access to a broader range of NOAA funding mechanisms. NOAA itself, which gains more flexible contracting tools. Foreign governments and regional organizations newly eligible for cooperative agreements. Recreational users of beaches and waterways who may see improved cleanup efforts.
Who is hurt
Taxpayers who bear the cost of the $2 million FY2025 appropriation and the extended authorization through 2029. Organizations that previously competed for a smaller pool of eligible partners may face more competition for grants. There are no groups with a direct, material negative impact identified in the bill's provisions.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that marine debris costs the U.S. fishing industry an estimated $260 million annually and that the existing administrative framework contained outdated language and gaps — such as the exclusion of Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations from grant eligibility — that this bill corrects. They contend that expanding NOAA's contracting flexibility and strengthening Foundation governance will make cleanup programs more effective and accountable, and that extending authorization through 2029 provides the program stability needed to plan and execute multi-year cleanup projects.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill's $2 million FY2025 appropriation and multi-year reauthorization add to federal spending without a rigorous evaluation of whether existing Marine Debris Foundation programs have achieved measurable outcomes. They contend that expanding grant eligibility to foreign governments raises questions about the appropriate use of U.S. taxpayer funds for international recipients, and that adding layers of Secretary of Commerce approval to Foundation board appointments could slow the organization's ability to respond quickly to emerging debris events.