Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
S-1318-119
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
Sponsored by Jerry Moran (R-KS)
What it does
This bill would require the American Battle Monuments Commission (ABMC) to create a program to identify deceased Jewish members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were buried in overseas U.S. military cemeteries under markers that incorrectly indicate they were not Jewish. The program would contact surviving family members and descendants of those servicemembers. The ABMC would be required to seek a contract with a nonprofit organization to run the program for the first 10 fiscal years after the bill is enacted.
Who benefits
Jewish families and descendants of misidentified servicemembers, who would receive official acknowledgment of their relatives' religious identity. Jewish veterans' organizations and heritage groups with an interest in accurate historical records. The ABMC, which would gain a structured mechanism to correct its records. Historians and genealogists working on military and Jewish-American history. Nonprofit organizations eligible to contract with the ABMC to administer the program.
Who is hurt
U.S. taxpayers who would bear the administrative costs of the program, though the scale is likely modest. The ABMC, which would take on a new administrative mandate. Nonprofit organizations that compete for but do not receive the contract. There are no clearly identifiable groups who would be materially harmed by the bill's core purpose.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that Jewish servicemembers who died for their country deserve to have their religious identity accurately reflected at their final resting place, and that correcting these records is a basic matter of dignity and historical accuracy. They contend that the ABMC currently lacks a systematic program to find and fix these errors, meaning families may never know their relatives were misidentified, and that a structured, nonprofit-administered effort is a targeted and cost-effective way to address a documented gap in military burial records.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill creates a new federal program and contracting obligation for what may be a very small number of cases, raising questions about whether the administrative infrastructure is proportionate to the scale of the problem. They contend that the ABMC already has authority to correct burial records and that a separate statutory mandate with a 10-year contracting requirement may be an inefficient use of federal resources compared to directing the ABMC to address the issue through existing administrative channels.
Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
Passed