HR-9027-119
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsored by Abraham Hamadeh (R-AZ)
What it does
This bill would authorize the Secretary of Defense to run a program offering discounts on motor fuel sold at military exchange stores to eligible patrons — those already authorized under federal law to shop at exchanges. The discount would be at least equal to the federal excise tax on gasoline (no less than 18.4 cents per gallon) and diesel (no less than 24.4 cents per gallon), with the Secretary permitted to add further discounts to offset state and local fuel taxes. The program would sunset on September 30, 2029, and would require annual reporting to the Armed Services Committees on costs, usage, and any fraud or abuse.
Who benefits
Active-duty military members and their families who shop at exchange stores. Military retirees authorized to use exchanges. Veterans with exchange shopping privileges. Reserve and National Guard members with exchange access. Surviving spouses of service members with exchange eligibility. Military exchange systems (Army & Air Force Exchange Service, Navy Exchange, Marine Corps Exchange) that may see increased fuel sales volume.
Who is hurt
Private gas station operators near military installations who may lose customers to discounted on-base fuel. State and local governments that rely on fuel tax revenue could see reduced collections if exchange fuel sales increase significantly, since exchanges are generally exempt from state and local taxes. Taxpayers broadly, to the extent the Department of Defense absorbs the cost of the discount. Exchange system operating budgets, which fund morale, welfare, and recreation programs, if the discount is not offset by increased volume.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that military families and veterans already face significant financial pressures, and that fuel costs represent a meaningful share of household budgets — particularly for service members stationed at remote installations with long commutes. They contend that exchange stores already operate tax-free as a congressionally authorized benefit, and this bill simply makes that benefit explicit and automatic at the pump, ensuring eligible patrons receive the full value of the tax exemption they are legally entitled to rather than having it absorbed elsewhere in the pricing chain.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill creates a new, open-ended subsidy that could strain exchange operating budgets — which fund military quality-of-life programs — without a clear funding offset or CBO cost estimate. They contend that the discretionary authority granted to the Secretary to add state and local tax discounts on top of the federal floor is poorly bounded, and that the three-year sunset and reporting requirement, while helpful, do not substitute for a rigorous fiscal analysis before the program launches.