HR-8388-119
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by Raul Ruiz (D-CA)
What it does
This bill would prohibit a sitting president, or any executive branch officer or employee acting on the president's behalf, from naming or designating any public facility after that president while they are in office. The prohibition would cover all federally administered buildings and any building or facility operated by an entity that receives federal funds. The restriction would last for the duration of the president's term.
Who benefits
Members of the public who prefer that public building names reflect historical consensus rather than decisions made by the honoree themselves. Future presidents who would be protected from the appearance of self-promotion. Taxpayers who fund federal buildings and facilities. Congress, which would retain greater influence over the symbolic use of federal property. Entities that receive federal funds but prefer not to be drawn into politically sensitive naming decisions.
Who is hurt
A sitting president who might otherwise wish to name a facility in their honor during their term. Executive branch agencies that currently have discretion over facility naming and would lose that authority. Entities receiving federal funds that might face ambiguity about whether their facilities fall under the bill's scope. Legal and compliance staff at federal grantees who would need to assess whether their buildings qualify as covered "public facilities."
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that allowing a sitting president to name public buildings after themselves creates an inherent conflict of interest, as the honoree is also the decision-maker. They contend that historical norms have generally reserved such honors for individuals after they leave office — or after death — so that the designation reflects lasting public consensus rather than self-interest, and that codifying this norm prevents its erosion by any future administration.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill's definition of "public facility" — extending to any building operated by an entity receiving federal funds — is potentially sweeping and vague, and could create compliance burdens for universities, hospitals, and nonprofits that have no connection to presidential naming decisions. They contend that existing political accountability and congressional oversight already deter self-serving naming, making a statutory prohibition unnecessary and potentially difficult to enforce.