HR-8211-119
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by Alma Adams (D-NC)
What it does
This bill would direct the Secretary of the Army to place a monument at Arlington National Cemetery honoring Army Security Agency (ASA) veterans who served between 1945 and 1976, covering World War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam era, and the Cold War era. The monument would be placed on a non-burial plot, limited to 52 by 18 inches at the base, and designed in coordination with the National Army Security Agency Association. If no suitable space is available inside Arlington, the monument would be placed just outside the cemetery entrance. All costs for site preparation, construction, installation, and maintenance would be paid by the National Army Security Agency Association, not the federal government.
Who benefits
Army Security Agency veterans who served between 1945 and 1976 and their surviving family members, who would receive formal public recognition of their service. The National Army Security Agency Association, which would gain an official commemorative presence at a nationally prominent site. Historians and the general public interested in the history of military signals intelligence. Arlington National Cemetery visitors who would have access to a broader representation of military service branches and units.
Who is hurt
No group faces direct material harm. Arlington National Cemetery administrators would bear some coordination and oversight burden, even though construction and maintenance costs are privately funded. Other veteran groups or military units seeking monument placement at Arlington may face increased competition for limited non-burial plot space. Taxpayers bear no direct cost under the bill's current structure, though indirect administrative costs to the Army are not explicitly addressed.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that Army Security Agency veterans performed critical signals intelligence and cryptologic work across four major conflicts — including intercepting enemy communications during the Korean and Vietnam wars — yet have no dedicated monument at Arlington despite the ASA's dissolution in 1976. They contend that the bill imposes zero cost on taxpayers, as all expenses are borne by the National Army Security Agency Association, making it a low-burden way to honor a historically overlooked group of veterans whose classified work prevented them from receiving public recognition during their service.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that Arlington National Cemetery faces severe space constraints and that directing the Secretary of the Army to place yet another monument — even on a non-burial plot — sets a precedent that could accelerate the proliferation of unit-specific memorials and further strain limited grounds. They contend that the Army already has discretionary authority to approve such monuments through existing processes, and that legislatively mandating placement for one specific unit bypasses the established review framework that ensures equitable consideration of all veteran groups seeking recognition.