HR-6826-118
Became Public Law No: 118-175.
Sponsored by Kweisi Mfume (D-MD)
What it does
This law gives an official federal name to the existing visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in Baltimore, Maryland. The center is designated the "Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center" in honor of the late U.S. Senator from Maryland. No funding, operational changes, or new programs are created by this legislation.
Who benefits
The family, friends, and admirers of the late Senator Paul S. Sarbanes, who served Maryland in the U.S. Senate for 30 years, benefit through the public recognition of his legacy. Maryland residents and Fort McHenry visitors may benefit from the commemorative acknowledgment of a prominent state figure. The National Park Service gains a formally designated name for the facility.
Who is hurt
No group faces a direct material harm from this legislation. Some members of the public may object on personal or political grounds to the use of a federal facility to honor a specific individual, but no financial cost, loss of access, or regulatory burden is imposed on any person or group.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that Paul S. Sarbanes dedicated three decades to public service in the U.S. Senate, representing Maryland with distinction and playing a key role in landmark legislation including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. They contend that naming the visitor center at Fort McHenry — a site central to American and Maryland history — is a fitting and lasting tribute to a senator who championed civic education and public institutions throughout his career. Supporters note that such designations cost taxpayers nothing and are a long-standing congressional tradition for honoring distinguished public servants.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that naming federal facilities after political figures, regardless of their record, sets a precedent that can blur the line between nonpartisan public spaces and political commemoration. They contend that Fort McHenry, as a nationally significant historic site, should remain identified with its own history rather than with any individual politician. Opponents may also argue that Congress's time and legislative resources are better directed toward substantive policy matters, and that local or state bodies — rather than federal law — are the more appropriate vehicles for such honorary designations.