Passed
405 Yea5 Nay20 Not voting2/3 required
HR-5201-119
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sponsored by Doris Matsui (D-CA)
What it does
This bill would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish a report on how well Kari's Law — a 2018 federal law requiring multiline telephone systems (such as those used in offices, hotels, and schools) to allow direct 911 dialing without a prefix — is being enforced. The report would need to include a summary of manufacturer and vendor compliance, any obstacles to compliance, and recommendations for policy changes or new legislation if needed.
Who benefits
People who use multiline telephone systems in workplaces, hotels, hospitals, schools, and other large buildings — particularly those who may need to call 911 in an emergency. Emergency responders who benefit from faster, unobstructed 911 access. Families of victims harmed by delayed 911 access due to non-compliant phone systems (the law is named after Kari Hunt, who was killed in a hotel room where her daughter could not dial 911 directly). Policymakers and the public who gain transparency into FCC enforcement activity.
Who is hurt
Multiline telephone system manufacturers and vendors who may face increased regulatory scrutiny or new compliance requirements stemming from the report's recommendations. The FCC, which would bear the administrative cost of conducting and publishing the report. Businesses operating non-compliant systems could face heightened enforcement pressure following the report's release.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that Kari's Law has been on the books since 2018, yet compliance among multiline telephone system operators remains inconsistent and difficult to verify, leaving people in offices, hotels, and schools at risk during emergencies. They contend that a formal FCC report with compliance data and actionable recommendations is a necessary first step to closing enforcement gaps and potentially saving lives — at minimal cost to taxpayers.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that this bill adds a reporting requirement without any enforcement mechanism, meaning it may produce a government document that leads to no concrete action. They contend that the FCC already has existing authority to monitor and enforce Kari's Law, and that a mandated report duplicates oversight work the agency could undertake on its own, consuming agency resources without guaranteeing improved compliance outcomes.
Passed