HR-4823-119
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform, Science, Space, and Technology, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by Claudia Tenney (R-NY)
What it does
The bill's full text was not provided beyond its title and referral information. Based on available information, this bill — titled the "Promoting Free and Fair Elections Act of 2025" — was introduced in the House on July 29, 2025, and referred to five committees: House Administration, Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform, Science, Space, and Technology, and Education and Workforce. The breadth of committee referrals suggests the bill would address multiple aspects of federal election administration, potentially including election security, oversight, technology, and workforce or voter participation provisions.
Who benefits
Without full bill text, specific beneficiaries cannot be confirmed. Based on the title and committee referrals, potential beneficiaries could include: voters seeking greater election integrity or access, state and local election administrators receiving federal support or guidance, technology vendors involved in election infrastructure, and federal oversight agencies gaining new authority or resources.
Who is hurt
Without full bill text, specific groups negatively affected cannot be confirmed. Potential groups who may bear costs include: state and local governments if new federal mandates are imposed (raising Tenth Amendment concerns), election technology vendors subject to new regulations, and potentially voters or jurisdictions subject to new requirements or restrictions depending on the bill's specific provisions.
Supporters argue
Supporters would likely argue that federal action is needed to ensure consistent, secure, and accessible elections across all states, pointing to documented vulnerabilities in election infrastructure and disparities in voting access. They would contend that the bill's broad committee referral reflects a comprehensive approach to election integrity that addresses technology, oversight, and workforce dimensions simultaneously.
Opponents argue
Opponents would likely argue that elections are constitutionally reserved to the states under the Elections Clause and the Tenth Amendment, and that federal mandates risk displacing well-functioning state systems with one-size-fits-all rules. They would contend that the bill's wide scope — spanning five committees — raises concerns about federal overreach into areas traditionally managed at the state and local level.