Failed
211 Yea213 Nay8 Not voting1/2 required
HR-3944-119
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House requests a conference.
Sponsored by John Carter (R-TX)
What it does
This bill would provide federal funding for fiscal year 2026 to three main areas: military construction projects (bases, housing, and facilities for all branches of the armed forces), the Department of Veterans Affairs (including health care, benefits, and cemeteries), and related agencies such as the American Battle Monuments Commission and the Armed Forces Retirement Home. It would also set rules and restrictions on how those funds may be spent. The bill is a standard annual appropriations measure that funds existing programs rather than creating new ones.
Who benefits
Veterans who rely on VA health care, disability benefits, and burial services — approximately 9 million enrolled VA patients. Active-duty service members and their families living in military housing. Defense contractors and construction firms that build or maintain military facilities. NATO allies who benefit from the NATO Security Investment Program. Employees of the VA, DOD, and related agencies whose jobs depend on continued appropriations. Communities near military bases that depend on base economic activity. Families of fallen service members who use national cemeteries and the American Battle Monuments Commission's overseas sites.
Who is hurt
Taxpayers who bear the cost of the appropriations. Programs or agencies not funded at requested levels, if the bill cuts below the President's budget request. Contractors or projects that are deferred or eliminated under base closure accounts. Advocacy groups seeking higher or lower spending levels than what the bill provides. Competing discretionary spending priorities that may be crowded out in the overall budget process.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that funding the VA and military construction is a core constitutional obligation and a moral commitment to those who served. They contend that the VA serves approximately 9 million enrolled veterans who depend on its health care system for everything from primary care to mental health treatment, and that delays in appropriations — such as those caused by continuing resolutions — disrupt care delivery and construction timelines. They further argue that military construction funding maintains readiness and supports the NATO alliance at a time of heightened global security concerns.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill's specific funding levels may be too high or too low depending on one's fiscal position — fiscal conservatives may contend that VA administrative costs and military construction budgets have grown without sufficient accountability, while advocates for veterans may argue the bill underfunds mental health services or benefits processing. They contend that bundling military construction, veterans affairs, and agriculture into a single package can obscure tradeoffs and limit meaningful debate on each program's merits, reducing congressional oversight effectiveness.
Failed
Amendment Rejected (44-51)
Amendment Rejected (45-50)
Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
Amendment Rejected (21-75)
Amendment Rejected (14-81)
Amendment Rejected (42-53)
Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
Amendment Rejected (15-81)
Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
Amendment Agreed to (81-15)
Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
Agreed to
Passed